Congrats to Fellow alum Charles Hathaway for his conference paper “Techniques for computer-assisted grading in computer science curricula” presented at the International Conference on Educational Technologies 2015.
I was thinking about doing something along these lines:
- Create a testable hypothesis: Tall people jump higher off the ground than shorter people
- Have all the students measure their jump height on the plate and also record their heights
- Compare the results by taking the average of each group
- Talk about how we can use other representations of data to learn more about the system (introduce the concept of box plots and standard deviation)
- Discuss other variables that could be important to understand results (student weight, age, sex)
- Discuss the differences between scientists and engineers and what they like better.
I visited the high school on Wednesday for after school. While I was walking through the high school, I saw a student that I had worked with the previous year in Mr. Amodeos class. He recognized me and I stopped to talk to him and three of his friends. He proudly told me that he had passed the biology regents with a score of 81, and now he was taking forensics. The four of us started talking about the use of science and math to improve training for sports.
I was really impressed by the student I worked with last year. When we were talking about boxing, he brought up the idea of moving your hands faster, gives them more energy. Without prompting, he told me that faster hands “it meant that there were more Joules” which meant harder punches. He started getting teased by his friend for saying “Jewels” are related to hand speed, but that changed when he turned out to be correct. He was really proud that he knew that when “he was in forensics, not physics”. I ended up working with the 4 of them for an hour after school and they promised to come back next week.